| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
TWINSCRW
Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
glittle75
Parts Changer
Joined: Sep 28, 2008
Posts: 474
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 9:36 am Post subject: |
 |
|
if i had a 100 grand, i would have one.
to bad they only made 50 though.......
bad ass car none the less. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ScreamingFast
Site Admin
Joined: Aug 17, 2008
Posts: 11380
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
over priced!!
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TWINSCRW
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| true but still impressive |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
heavy94
Parts Changer
Joined: Mar 28, 2009
Posts: 216
Location: bear creek
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dont know if anyone read the article or not. i believe that if the car is factory stock that it falls into the guide lines. the rules just state that the cam or cams cannot be over a certain amount of lift and duration. must have stock type suspension. has to be a certain wieght. if the car qualifies for all the rules than that means it is a F/S-S class car.
_________________
You know your too drunk to drive when you swerve to miss a tree and you realize it was the fucking air freshener
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
